DECENTRALISATION AND DELIVERY OF SECONDARY SCHOOL EDUCATION: EXAMINING INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY IN TANDAHIMBA AND MTWARA DISTRICTS, TANZANIA

  • Nnunduma, E. S. University of Dodoma
  • Kopoka, P. A. University of Dodoma

Abstract

Purpose of the study:

The significance of institutional capacity has been advocated in as one of the way to improve provision of social services such as secondary school education to the society. The aim of this paper was to analyse the capacity of secondary school management in education service delivery in Tandahimba and Mtwara districts, Tanzania.

Short introduction of problem statement:

Regardless of implementation of decentralisation in Tandahimba and Mtwara districts, the districts had been ranking among the lowest in the national examinations results of form two and four for the last five years.

Method/methodology:

Research design applied in this study was cross-sectional explanatory research which employed a semi structured questionnaire to collect quantitative data from 229 secondary school teachers and district education officers. Also, an interview guide was used to collect qualitative data from District Executive Directors (DEDs), Region Administrative Secretary (RAS) and District education officers (DEOs) as key informants, whereas a focus group discussion was used to collect data from teachers and parents. The quantitative data were analysed using measures of central tendency whilst the qualitative data was analysed using content analysis.

Results of the study:

The findings revealed that there is no shortage of skills, knowledge and teaching experiences but infrastructures and equipments. Therefore, this study concludes that the shortage of infrastructure and equipments might have been led to low level of academic performance as a result of provision of low quality education to secondary students.

Conclusion and policy recommendation:

Therefore, based on the findings the study concludes that, in case of soft resources (skills, knowledge and experiences) the schools have enough of them to deliver education effectively to secondary schools’ students. However, regarding to the hard resources (infrastructures and equipments), the schools record an acute shortage. Based on the findings, policy implications had been suggested to encourage lower level take initiatives and innovative measures in making sure proper education is provided to youths for the benefit of the nation bearing in mind that they are the tomorrow nation. This is only possible if the central government and LGAs devolves or shift powers to these lower units of the government such as schools and communities. Those powers should be exercised in order to bring the expected impact of decentralisation.

Keywords: Decentralisation, Institutional, Capacity, Resources, Infrastructure, Knowledge

Author Biographies

Nnunduma, E. S., University of Dodoma

PhD Candidate, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Political Science and Public Administration

Kopoka, P. A., University of Dodoma

College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Political Science and Public Administration

References

Al-Saleh, M.F. & Yousif, A.E. (2009). Properties of the Standard Deviation that are Rarely Mentioned in Classrooms. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 38(3); 193–202.

Aycrigg, M. (2013). Participation and the World Bank: Success, Constraints, and Responses. Social Development Paper No. 29. Washington, DC: World Bank

Binswanger, H. (2011). Technical Consultation on the Decentralization of Rural Development. Proceedings of FAO conference, Rome, 16-18 December 1997. Rome: FAO

Boex, J. & Yilmaz, S. (2010). An Analytical Framework for Assessing Decentralized Local Governance and the Local Public Sector. IDG Working Paper No. 2010-06. Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance.

Cabral, L. (2011). Decentralisation in Africa: Scope, Motivations and Impact on Service Delivery and Poverty. Working papare 020. Overseas Development Institute and Future Agricultures

Carlitz, R. & McGee, R. (2013). Raising the stakes: The impact of Hakielimu’s advocacy work on education policy and budget in Tanzania. Study No. 12, June 2013

Carlitz, R. (2016). Promoting Active Engagement of School Management Committees in Tanzania: A Research Proposal. University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Marrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th edition). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis group.

Cooksey, B. & Kikula, I. (2005). When bottom-up meets top-down: the limits of local participation in local government planning in Tanzania. Special Paper No: 17, Research on Poverty Alleviation. Mkuki na Nyota Publishers

Daba, O.T. (2010). Decentralization and Community Participation in Education in Ethiopia: A case of three woredas in Horro Gudduru Wollaga Zone of Oromia National Regional State. Institute for Educational Research, Faculty of Education, UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: For small-scale social research projects, Fourth Edition. London: McGraw-Hill.

Edwards Jr. D. B., & DeMatthews, D. (2014). Historical trends in educational decentralization in the United States and developing countries: A periodization and comparison in the post-WWII context. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(40): 1-39

Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Retrieved November 29, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557

Evans, N.N., Bosire, J. & Ajowi, J. (2016). Analysis of the Challenges Faced by Principals in the Management of Support Staff in Public Secondary Schools in Nyamira County, Kenya. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 4: 41-50

Gurr, D. (2015). A Model of Successful School Leadership from the International Successful School Principal-ship Project. Societies, 5 (2015) 136–150

Hoffman, B.D. (2006). Political accountability at the local level in Tanzania, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1zg1g7nj

Idoli, N.B., Ekpang, P.U. & Esuabana, S.B. (2011). Impact of school administration on students learning. Nigerian Journal of Social and Development Issues, 8(1), 80-92

Jütting, J., Corsi, E., Kauffmann, C., McDonnell, I., Osterrieder, H., Pinaud, N. & Wegner, L. (2005). What makes decentralization in developing countries pro-poor?’, The European Journal of Development Research, 17 (4), pp. 626-648.

Kinemo, S., Ndikumana, E., Kiyabo, H., Shilingi, V., Kwayu, M. & Andrea, P. (2015). Decentralization of Human Resource Management in Tanzanian Governmental Organization. In Ko de Ridder,Emans, B.,Hulst & Tollenaar eds. Public Administration in Tanzania, Current issues and challenges. African studies centre, African Public Administration and Management series,Vol.3

Kisumbe, L; Sanga, D. & Kasubi, J. W. (2014). More than a Decade of Decentralisation in Tanzania: Its Implications on Pro-poor Service Delivery. The Case of Primary Education and Health Services. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(2), ISSN 2250-3153

Kopweh, P. S. (2014). Curriculum development in Tanzania: an investigation of the formulation, management and implementation of the 2005 curriculum reform in selected disadvantaged districts (Doctoral thesis, University of Glasgow). Glasgow Theses Service. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/5774/

Kothari, S. K. (2009). Research Methodology. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.

Massawe, D. (2014). Assessment of Leadership Practices at School Level in Community Secondary Schools: A Case of Selected Schools in Kinondoni Municipality, Tanzania. A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education in Administration, Planning and Policy Studies of the Open University of Tanzania

Matete, R. (2016). Challenges Facing Primary Education under Decentralisation of Primary School Management in Tanzania. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(1); 175-184

Mawudeku, I. & Amkumah, F.J. (2021). The Role of Administrators in Enhancing Students’ Academic Performance in Higher Education Institutions. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 26, Issue 9, Series 3, pages 16-22

Mdee, A. & Thorley, L. (2016). Good governance, local government, accountability and service delivery in Tanzania. Exploring the context for creating a local governance performance index. Working Paper 2.

Meckling, W.H. & Jensen, M.C. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976) 305-360

Mofuga, C.S. (2020). Influence of leadership attributes of head of schools on the student’s academic performance in selected secondary schools in Tanzania: A case of Mbulu district (PhD Thesis, Open University of Tanzania). GRIN Verlag. https://www.dymocks.com.au/book/

Mollel, H. A., & Tollenaar, A. (2013). Decentralization in Tanzania: Design and Application in Planning Decisions. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(5), 344-353.

Mushemeza, E., D. (2019). Decentralisation in Uganda: Trends, Achievements, Challenges and Proposals for Consolidation, Kampala: ACODE Policy Research Paper Series No.93. ACODE.

NECTA (2016a). Matokeo ya Mtihani wa Kidato cha Nne (Form Four National Examination results). Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

NECTA (2016b). Matokeo ya Mtihani wa Kidato cha Pili (Form Two National Examination results). Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Pham, L.T.M. (2018). Qualitative Approach to Research: A Review of Advantages and Disadvantages of Three Paradigms. Masters Thesis. The University of Aldelaide.

Rumsey, D. J. (2016). Statistics for Dummies (2nd Edition). Wiley Publications. 416 pages. ISBN: 978-1-119-29352-1.

Sow, M. & Razafimahefa, I.F. (2015). Fiscal Decentralization and the Efficiency of Public Service Delivery. IMF Working Paper WP/15/59. Fiscal Affairs Department, IMF.

Swanson, R. A. & Holton, E. F (2001). Foundations of Human Resource Development. San Franciso: Berrett-Koehler.

Tejada, J. J. & Punzalan, J. R. B. (2012). On the Misuse of Slovin’s Formula. The Philippine Statistician, 61(1), 129-136.

Tidemand, P. (2018). Situational analysis: UNICEF Tanzania Decentralization and Local Governance Support Strategy (Mainland and Zanzibar). UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/tanzania/media/1491/file/DeLOG-Assessment-Stocktake.pdf

United Republic of Tanzania. (2005a). Final Report of a Strategic Framework for the Financing of Local Governments in Tanzania. Author.

URT (2010). Education sector development programme (ESDP): Education sector performance report 2009/2010. Ministry of Education and Vocational Training.

Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. In New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts, ed. James Connell et al. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.

Yaakov, O.B. & Tubin, D. I. (2014). The evolution of success. In Leading Schools Successfully: Stories from the Field; Day, C., Gurr, D., Eds Routledge: London, UK, 2014; pp. 19–30.

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, An introductory Analysis 2nd Ed. New York: Harper
Published
2022-08-26
How to Cite
Nnunduma, E. S., & Kopoka, P. A. (2022). DECENTRALISATION AND DELIVERY OF SECONDARY SCHOOL EDUCATION: EXAMINING INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY IN TANDAHIMBA AND MTWARA DISTRICTS, TANZANIA. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 4(8), 22 - 40. Retrieved from https://ajoeijournals.org/sys/index.php/ajoei/article/view/316
Section
Articles