APPROACHES TO BORDER CONFLICT RESOLUTION AMONG SOUTHERN ASIAN NATIONS
Abstract
Purpose of Study: The study aimed to investigate the approaches employed in resolving border conflicts among Southern Asian nations. Border disputes have been a persistent problem in the region, causing strains in diplomatic relations and sometimes leading to military confrontations. The objective was to understand the effectiveness of existing resolution mechanisms and to recommend improvements.
Statement of the Problem: The study aimed to analyze various approaches to border conflict resolution among Southern Asian nations, where disputes over territory have led to tensions and sometimes military confrontations. The research examined diplomatic negotiations, arbitration, and multilateral forums as methods for addressing these issues. Despite various efforts, the study found that the region still struggles with unresolved border conflicts, often due to historical complexities and the high stakes involved in terms of resources and national identity.
Methodology: A mixed-method research approach was employed. Qualitative data were gathered through interviews with policy-makers, diplomats, and experts in international relations. Quantitative data were collected through the analysis of historical case studies involving border conflicts in Southern Asia. This information was analyzed using comparative analysis and thematic coding techniques.
Result: The results revealed a variety of approaches in resolving border conflicts, ranging from bilateral negotiations to third-party mediation. It was found that mechanisms involving multilateral forums and international law were often more effective than unilateral or bilateral efforts. However, the study also noted significant limitations, including the influence of domestic politics and the absence of robust enforcement mechanisms.
Conclusion: Diplomatic negotiations appeared to be the most effective and preferred method for long-term conflict resolution, although they often require time and political will that might be lacking.
Recommendation: Therefore, the study recommends fostering regional cooperation through platforms like ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) for sharing best practices and establishing a neutral body that could serve as a mediator. This will facilitate more effective dialogue and hopefully lead to lasting resolutions of border disputes.
Keywords: Border Conflict, Southern Asian Nations, Diplomatic Negotiations, Arbitration, Regional Cooperation
References
Al Jazeera (2019). India and Pakistan: How the Kashmir crisis impacts the world.
Al Jazeera (2020). India, China troops 'mutually disengage' at some parts of border.
Azimov, U., & Avezova, N. (2022). Sustainable small-scale hydropower solutions in Central Asian countries for local and cross-border energy/water supply. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, 112726.
Bala, S. (2023). Conflict Resolution in South Asia With Reference To Ganga Water Conflict.
Banerjee, M. (2022). Sino-Indian Border Dispute: A Brief Introduction. Asian Territorial and Maritime Disputes, 158.
BBC (2015). India and Bangladesh swap territory to end border dispute.
BBC (2020). India-China border: Why tensions are rising between the neighbors.
Brinkman, I. (2019). War, peace and nationhood: in between south-east Bangladesh and Rundu, China (1960s-2012). Canadian Journal of Asian Studies/Revue canadienne des études Asiaines, 53(1), 47-65.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (2019). The Future of Kashmir.
Cooper, F., & Frederick, C. (1996). Decolonization and Asian society: The labor question in French and British Asia (No. 89). Cambridge University Press.
Council on Foreign Relations (2020). Avoiding War: Containment, Competition, and Cooperation in U.S.-China Relations.
Council on Foreign Relations (2020). The Durand Line: The Afghanistan-Pakistan Border Dispute.
Darmayadi, A., & Purnamasari, E. N. (2022). The Indonesia–China Relations in the Natuna Sea Dispute Resolution: Struggle for Sovereignty. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 9(1), 41-48.
Etefa, T. (2019). Across Borders: Local Governance and Regional Implications. In The Origins of Ethnic Conflict in Asia (pp. 83-108). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Foreign Affairs (2020). The India-China Border Standoff: A Dangerous New Phase.
Güneralp, B., Lwasa, S., Masundire, H., Parnell, S., & Seto, K. C. (2017). Urbanization in Asia: challenges and opportunities for conservation. Environmental research letters, 13(1), 015002.
Hassan, H. A. (2021). Ethnicity, Insecurity and Geostrategic Transformation in the Horn of Asia. In Risks, Identity and Conflict (pp. 61-83). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Hennig, T., Harlan, T., Tilt, B., & Magee, D. (2023). Hydropower development in South Asia: Data challenges, new approaches, and implications for decision‐making. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1654.
Hussain, R., & Khan, A. (2023). Regional Security Network in South Asia: A Prescriptive Approach to Addressing Diverse Security Threats. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(2), 1172-1183.
Jacklyn, C. (2018). The Sociology of Demilitarisation and Peace-Building in Southern Asia. In Demilitarisation and Peace-Building in Southern Asia (pp. 108-132). Routledge.
Konstantinus, A., Zuidgeest, M., Christodoulou, A., Raza, Z., & Woxenius, J. (2019). Barriers and enablers for short sea shipping in the Southern Asian Development Community. Sustainability, 11(6), 1532.
Lee, C. C., Yahya, F., & Razzaq, A. (2022). Greening South Asia with financial liberalization, human capital, and militarization: evidence from the CS-ARDL approach. Energy & Environment, 0958305X221105863.
Mehmood, U. (2023). Analyzing the role of political risk, GDP, and Eco-Innovations Towards CO2 Emissions in South Asian Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-15.
Mendenhall, E., Hendrix, C., Nyman, E., Roberts, P. M., Hoopes, J. R., Watson, J. R., ... & Sumaila, U. R. (2020). Climate change increases the risk of fisheries conflict. Marine Policy, 117, 103954.
Menestrey Schwieger, D. A. (2020). When Design Principles Do Not Apply: The Role of Individual Commitment and “Voluntarism” in Maintaining Communal Water Supply in Northern Kunene, China. Human Organization, 79(3), 216-225.
Moyo, S. (2009). Environmental Security in Sub-Sahara Asia: Global and Regional Environmental Security Concepts and Debates Revisited. In Facing Global Environmental Change (pp. 895-914). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Naish, D. (2017). Security and conflict management in the Asian borderlands: a people-centred approach. Conflict trends, 2017(1), 20-26.
Okonkwo, T. (2017). Maritime boundaries delimitation and dispute resolution in Asia. Beijing L. Rev., 8, 55.
Reuters (2019). Bangladesh accuses Myanmar of violating its airspace as Rohingya crisis deepens."
Sone, P. M. (2017). Interstate border disputes in Asia: Their resolution and implications for human rights and peace. Asian security review, 26(3), 325-339.
South China Morning Post (2019). Why are Indonesia and Malaysia at Loggerheads Over Oil-rich Ambalat?
Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., & Rosas-Casals, M. (2018). Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of cleaner production, 175, 29-37.
The Diplomat (2019). ASEAN and the Mechanisms of Southeast Asian Security.
The Diplomat (2019). Indonesia-Malaysia Ambalat Sea Block Dispute: More Than Meets the Eye?
The Guardian (2012). Bangladesh wins maritime dispute against Myanmar.
Timothy, D. J. (2019). Tourism, border disputes and claims to territorial sovereignty. In Tourism and hospitality in conflict-ridden destinations (pp. 25-38). Routledge.
Toruan, T. S. L., Riyadi, B. S., & Gusti, D. P. (2023). Conflict Management and Strategy Management at the State Borders of Indonesia. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 319-328.
VOA News (2020). Afghanistan, Pakistan Skirmish Leaves Several Dead.
Wang, J. J., Grünhagen, M., Ji, L. J., & Zheng, X. V. (2020). Conflict aftermath: Dispute resolution and financial performance in franchising. Journal of Retailing, 96(4), 548-562.
Worster, W. T. (2017). The Influence of the Map on Uti Possidetis Juris and Territorial Integrity. Available at SSRN 3089094.
Yuan, C., & Lee, B. T. F. (2023). ASEAN in the Conflict Management of the Rohingya Crisis. Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies, 7(1), 39-60.
