PROCUREMENT PRACTICES AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF FREENET AG TELECOMMUNICATION IN HAMBURG, GERMANY

  • Carsten Linnemann Manta University of Hamburg
  • Philipp Amthor Bunea University of Hamburg
  • Jens Spahn Ismail University of Hamburg

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: Effective procurement practices can significantly enhance organizational performance by optimizing costs, improving supplier relationships, and ensuring the availability of quality goods and services. The purpose of the study was to examine the Procurement Practices and Organizational Performance of Freenet AG Telecommunication in Hamburg, Germany

Statement of the Problem: Freenet AG faces the challenge of optimizing its procurement practices to balance the acquisition of cutting-edge telecommunications technology and services while effectively managing costs to remain competitive in Hamburg's telecommunications market. The firm needs to address the need for effective risk management within its procurement processes to safeguard against cybersecurity threats and supply chain disruptions, which can have significant consequences for its organizational performance.

Methodology: The study was literature based. The study collected and analyzed existing research and publications to inferences.

Findings: The firm has successfully cultivated and maintained strong supplier relationships, enabling the company to access cutting-edge technology, negotiate favorable terms, and ensure timely deliveries, thereby contributing to its competitive advantage and ability to innovate. The company's commitment to cost efficiency is evident in its procurement practices, with a focus on optimizing the supply chain and negotiating cost-effective agreements, resulting in improved profitability and sustained competitiveness. Freenet AG's emphasis on innovation in its procurement processes positions the company to meet evolving customer demands by consistently acquiring and implementing cutting-edge technology and solutions, solidifying its reputation as a market leader. The company's proactive approach to regulatory compliance ensures alignment with Germany's complex telecommunications regulations, mitigating legal complications and penalties, and fostering an environment of ethical business practices and public trust.

Conclusion: Firms’ procurement practices play a pivotal role in shaping its organizational performance within the competitive telecommunications industry of Hamburg, Germany. The company's strengths in building effective supplier relationships, maintaining cost efficiency, fostering innovation, ensuring regulatory compliance, and managing risks effectively have positioned it as a formidable player in the market. By continually improving in these areas and aligning with sustainability initiatives, Freenet AG is well-positioned to sustain its success and contribute positively to the local economy and digital infrastructure of Hamburg.

Recommendations: Freenet AG should further enhance its supplier relationships by actively engaging in collaborative partnerships. This can lead to better terms, access to innovation, and improved supply chain reliability, ultimately fostering greater organizational agility. To maintain its cost efficiency, the company should institute a culture of continuous cost optimization. Regularly review procurement processes, embrace automation where possible, and benchmark costs against industry standards to identify and act on opportunities for cost reduction. In line with evolving environmental standards and customer expectations, the firm should invest more in sustainability initiatives within its procurement practices. Prioritize suppliers with strong eco-friendly credentials, assess the environmental impact of products and services, and establish measurable sustainability goals to promote responsible business practices.

Keywords: Procurement Practices, Organizational Performance, Germany

Author Biographies

Carsten Linnemann Manta, University of Hamburg

University of Hamburg

Philipp Amthor Bunea , University of Hamburg

University of Hamburg

Jens Spahn Ismail, University of Hamburg

University of Hamburg

References

Abideen, A. Z., Pyeman, J., Sundram, V. P. K., Tseng, M. L., & Sorooshian, S. (2021). Leveraging capabilities of technology into a circular supply chain to build circular business models: A state-of-the-art systematic review. Sustainability, 13(16), 8997.

Abul Hassan, S. H., Ismail, S., & Ahmad@ Abdul Mutalib, H. (2021). Public procurement in Malaysia: objectives and procurement principles. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 37(4), 694-710.

Alabdali, M. A., & Salam, M. A. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on supply chain procurement for creating competitive advantage: An empirical study. Sustainability, 14(19), 12269.

Corboș, R. A., Bunea, O. I., & Jiroveanu, D. C. (2023). The Effects of Strategic Procurement 4.0 Performance on Organizational Competitiveness in the Circular Economy. Logistics, 7(1), 13.

Das, K. C., & Mahalik, M. K. (2023). Renewable energy use and export performance of manufacturing firms: Panel evidence from six industries in India. Energy Economics, 125, 106894.

Eggert, J., & Hartmann, J. (2021). Purchasing's contribution to supply chain emission reduction. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 27(2), 100685.

Goggins, G. (2018). Developing a sustainable food strategy for large organizations: The importance of context in shaping procurement and consumption practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 838-848.

Ha, W., Yang, P., Choi, Y., Ra, S., Hayashi, R., & McCutcheon, C. (2023). Crossing the Rivers by Touching the Stones: Alternative Approaches in Technical and Vocational Education and Training from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311231182157.

Handfield, R., Jeong, S., & Choi, T. (2019). Emerging procurement technology: data analytics and cognitive analytics. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 49(10), 972-1002.

Lee, K., Azmi, N., Hanaysha, J., Alzoubi, H., & Alshurideh, M. (2022). The effect of digital supply chain on organizational performance: An empirical study in Malaysia manufacturing industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 495-510.

Manta, O., Panait, M., Hysa, E., Rusu, E., & Cojocaru, M. (2022). Public procurement, a tool for achieving the goals of sustainable development. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(61), 861-876.

Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Adams, F. G., & Wieland, A. (2022). A responsiveness view of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(1), 62-91.

Shashi, Tavana, M., Shabani, A., & Singh, R. (2019). The impact of interwoven integration practices on supply chain value addition and firm performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15, 39-51.

Shraah, A., Abu-Rumman, A., Alqhaiwi, L., & AlShaar, H. (2022). The impact of sourcing strategies and logistics capabilities on organizational performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Jordanian pharmaceutical industries. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 1077-1090.
Published
2023-10-13
How to Cite
Manta, C. L., Bunea , P. A., & Ismail, J. S. (2023). PROCUREMENT PRACTICES AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF FREENET AG TELECOMMUNICATION IN HAMBURG, GERMANY. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 5(16), 1 -14. Retrieved from https://ajoeijournals.org/sys/index.php/ajoei/article/view/498
Section
Articles