THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN HEALTH RISK COMMUNICATION: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FACEBOOK AND INSTAGRAM

Authors

  • James K. Asante University of Media, Arts and Communication, Accra

Abstract

Purpose of Study: This study explores the effectiveness of Facebook and Instagram in communicating health risks, with a particular focus on how these platforms influence user engagement, trust, and behavioral responses.

Problem Statement: Social media has become a key tool in health risk communication, allowing real-time dissemination of critical health information.

Methodology: Using a mixed-methods approach, the study surveyed 150 social media users and conducted structured interviews with health communication officers.

Result: The findings indicate that while Facebook and Instagram enhance the accessibility of health information, they also present challenges related to misinformation, credibility, and user skepticism. Participants preferred health content endorsed by experts and reputable organizations, but misinformation remains a significant barrier.

Conclusion: The study underscores the need for fact-checking mechanisms, digital literacy initiatives, and algorithmic adjustments to improve the credibility of health risk communication. The findings contribute to discussions on how social media can be optimized for public health messaging, particularly in the digital misinformation age.

Keywords: Social media, health risk communication, misinformation, Facebook, Instagram, trust in health communication

Author Biography

James K. Asante, University of Media, Arts and Communication, Accra

Faculty of Journalism and Media Studies

References

Covello, V. T. (1996). Communicating risk information: A guide to evaluating and improving risk communication programs. John Wiley & Sons.

Covello, V. T., & Sandman, P. M. (2021). Risk communication: Evolution and revolution. Journal of Risk Research, 24(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1772345

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

Porat, T., Nyrup, R., Calvo, R. A., Paudyal, P., & Ford, E. (2019). Public health and risk communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: Facebook’s role in shaping information exposure and engagement. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(6), e19932. https://doi.org/10.2196/19932

Pew Research Center. (2021). Social media use in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021

Smith, J. A., & Burgess, M. (2017). Health communication in the digital era: The role of social media in shaping health perceptions. Health Communication Quarterly, 34(4), 412-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1320001

Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (2019). Misinformation and mass audiences. University of Texas Press.

Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2020). Public health and online misinformation: Challenges and recommendations. Annual Review of Public Health, 41(1), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127

Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621-645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

Downloads

Published

2024-11-22

How to Cite

Asante, J. K. (2024). THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN HEALTH RISK COMMUNICATION: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FACEBOOK AND INSTAGRAM. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 6(20), 96–105. Retrieved from https://ajoeijournals.org/sys/index.php/ajoei/article/view/813

Issue

Section

Articles