ESTABLISHMENT STRUCTURAL DIMENSION DESIGN, EXIGENCY VARIABLES, AND CHALLENGES MITIGATION IN KENYA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of establishment structural dimension design, exigency variables, and challenges mitigation in Kenya.
Research Methodology: The study employed a literature review from previous studies. The data was collected from peer-reviewed journals, books, and academic websites. The data was analyzed using thematic analysis.
Findings: The study found that a well-designed structural dimension plays a crucial role in shaping the organization's ability to communicate effectively and achieve desired outcomes. The study also indicated that clear lines of communication and effective information flow are essential elements that contribute to enhanced communication effectiveness within organizations. In addition, the study found that the detrimental effects of exigency variables often result in breakdowns and reduced efficiency in information transmission. The study also established that common challenges in organizational communication that hinder its effectiveness include information overload, lack of clarity in communication channels, and cultural barriers.
Conclusion: The findings of the study suggest that the design of the structural dimension, the presence of exigency variables, and the mitigation of challenges all play a role in the effectiveness of organizational communication.
Recommendations: The study found that the design of the structural dimension, the presence of exigency variables, and the mitigation of challenges all play a role in the effectiveness of organizational communication. The findings of the study suggest that organizations should design their structural dimensions in a way that facilitates effective communication, be aware of the potential challenges that can hinder communication and take steps to mitigate them, and provide training to employees on how to communicate effectively in a globalized environment.
Keywords: Establishment, Structural Dimension Design, Exigency Variables, Challenges Mitigation
References
Barton, C. (1977). Approaches to the Evaluation of Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of the Academy of Management review, 2 (3).https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245460359
Baylis, J. (2020). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. Oxford university press, USA. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198825548.001.0001
Betts, S. C. (2003). Contingency theory: science or technology? Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 1(8). https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v1i8.3044
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS quarterly, 471-482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2004). Strategic organizational diagnosis and design: The dynamics of fit (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9114-0
Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. (2022). Business & society: Ethics, sustainability & stakeholder management. Cengage Learning.
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial empire. Cambridge Mass.
Charles, G. (2015). The Role of Organizational Culture and Climate in Innovation and Effectiveness. Journal of Human Service Organization, 39 (4) 245 -250. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1087770
Daft, R. L. (2010). The Executive and the Elephant: A Leader's Guide for Building Inner Excellence. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2543
Daft, R., L, Murphy, J.& Wilmott, H. (2017). Organizational theory: an international perspective Girod, S.and Whittington, R. (2017). Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1121-1133.
Daft, R.L. (2016). Organization theory and design. Boston, MA: South Western Cengage learning.
de Almeida, L. A., & Balasundharam, V. (2018). On the impact of structural reforms on output and employment: Evidence from a cross-country firm-level analysis. International Monetary Fund.
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229249
Ferri, L. M., & Pedrini, M. (2018). Socially and environmentally responsible purchasing: Comparing the impacts on buying firm's financial performance, competitiveness and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 880-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.035
Greve, H. (2011). Positional rigidity: Low performance and resource acquisition in large and small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.875
Guo, W., & Chen, M. (2022). Construction of structural dimensions of organizational human capital competitive advantage. Journal of Intellectual capital, 23(5), 1081-1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2020-0223
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American sociological review, 149-164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
Hu, S., He, Z., Blettner, D., and Bettis, R. (2017). Conflict inside and outside: Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1435-1454. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2556
Ishak, A. W., & Williams, E. A. (2018). A dynamic model of organizational resilience: Adaptive and anchored approaches. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(2), 180-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2017-0037
Jones, G.R. (2013). Organization theory design and change. Global Edition (7thed.). New York, NY: Pearson
Kivaa, T. (2021). Role of Universities in The Achievement of SDGs in Kenya. AFRICA HABITAT REVIEW, 33-42.
Kivaa, T., Mugwima, B. and Mutungi, S. (2021). An evaluation of the Organizational performance of local contractors in Kenya. Electronic upload. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349903103
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard business review.
Král, P., & Králová, V. (2016). impact of organizational structural dimension design on communication effectiveness: The effect of drivers and communication. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5169-5174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.099
Kwok, F., Sharma, P., Gaur, S. S., & Ueno, A. (2019). Interactive effects of information exchange, relationship capital and environmental uncertainty on international joint venture (IJV) performance: An emerging markets perspective. International Business Review, 28(5), 101481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.008
Lartey, F. M. (2020). Chaos, complexity, and contingency theories: a comparative analysis and application to the 21st century organization. Journal of Business Administration Research, 9(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.5430/jbar.v9n1p44
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211
Maiers, C., Reynolds, M., & Haselkorn, M. (2005, July). Challenges to effective information and communication systems in humanitarian relief organizations. In IPCC 2005. Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, 2005. (pp. 82-91). IEEE.
Millar, J. A. (1978). Contingency theory, values, and change. Human Relations, 31(10), 885-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677803101004
Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of" direct" research. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 582-589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392364
Morrison, T. (2010). The strategic leadership of complex practice: opportunities and challenges. Child Abuse Review, 19(5), 312-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1149
Nason, R., Bacq, S. and Gras, D. (2018). A behavioral theory of social performance: Social identity and stakeholder expectations. Academy of Management Review, 43: 259-283.https://scholarworks.iu.edu/bitsream/25922. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0081
Ojha, D., Struckell, E., Acharya, C., & Patel, P. C. (2021). Managing environmental turbulence through innovation speed and operational flexibility in B2B service organizations. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(9), 1627-1645. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0026
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Understanding power in organizations. California management review, 34(2), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166692
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of management, 34(3), 375-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Robbins, S. (1990). Organizational theory, structure, designs and applications. New York NY: Pearson.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
Shen, H., Choi, C., Masa, J., Li, X., Qiu, J., Jung, Y., & Sun, Z. (2021). Electrochemical ammonia synthesis: mechanistic understanding and catalyst design. Chem, 7(7), 1708-1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.01.009
Shum, P., Bove, L., & Auh, S. (2008). Employees' affective commitment to change: The key to successful CRM implementation. European journal of marketing, 42(11/12), 1346-1371. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810903709
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & environment, 21(2), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042
Tung, R. L., & Miller, E. L. (1990). Managing in the twenty-first century: The need for global orientation. MIR: Management International Review, 5-18.
Vestberg, M. (2018). Organizational dynamics: An investigation into a company's work culture and internal structures, to understand how it functions.
Wang, T., Olivier, D. F., & Chen, P. (2020). Creating individual and organizational readiness for change: conceptualization of system readiness for change in school education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818131
Weber, M. (1947). Max Weber: The theory of social and economic organization. (No Title).
Zhang, Y., Shi, X., Zhang, H., Cao, Y., & Terzija, V. (2022). Review on deep learning applications in frequency analysis and control of modern power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 136, 107744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107744
